 |
 |
|
|
|
| Wednesday, December 19, 2007 |
|
In the News on December 19, 2007
By Eric Livingston ::
19 Comments :: Email to a friend
|
|
A Wall Street Journal editorial calls out Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and Democrat Presidential candidate Chris Dodd for "wigging out" on renewing provisions of FISA which would allow US intelligence services to monitor overseas communications of suspected terrorists. The current authorization, which expires on February 1st, accounts for new technologies since the 1978 bill was first enacted and only applies to intelligence targets overseas, but Reid and Dodd seem content to let it expire.
That may be fine with some Democrats, who have always been more comfortable treating terrorism as a law-enforcement problem rather than a real war. But it's a tough political sell to say that America should respect the "civil liberties" of al Qaeda terrorists overseas. So instead, wiretapping opponents are vilifying corporations. "For the last six years, our largest telecom companies have been spying on their own American customers," says Senator Christopher Dodd of Connecticut.
USA Today reports on the Senate passing a funding bill last night which includes $70 billion to fund our troops in Iraq and Afghanistan. While its a relief that the Senate has finally passed this funding measure, forestalling any DoD civilian layoffs and provided needed supplies and support for the military, this issue is expected to resurface in January since this is only a fraction of the full year's funding requested by President Bush. |
|
|
|
|
| Comments |
By
keeemosabe @
Monday, December 24, 2007 11:07 PM
|
Dear ptbaa, I see there seems to be no war you don't like. I'm becoming convinced it's because the Repubs in order to defend and make sense of their "might makes right" foreign policy , lash out that most any war is justified as long as we are on the attack. Well, how many countries do you really want to attack at a time? Any that tweaks the nose of the US? Like Venezuela, Syria, North Korea, Pakistan, Iran, China? there must be somewhere you draw the line. But I don’t see it. I see people who wish Carter had started a war with Iran...last night! I hear people on the radio who fault the US for getting out of Vietnam. They must really miss those days and long to be back there in Vietnam to kick some butt that was missed somewhere. So you go ahead and promote war at every turn. One day the whole damned world will turn on us, and condemn us for being a bunch of warmongers in need of hogtying and censure. I hope it does not get that far. But I read the tea leaves, and hope your visions of war are defeated at the polls before they come to fruition. Sincerely. Grow up already. The world is not your bully's playground.
|
|
|
By
keeemosabe @
Tuesday, December 25, 2007 12:48 AM
|
Pssst. Here is some real propaganda from a lilly-livered lefty. Paste this into your browser for a laugh. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YENbElb5-xY
|
|
|
By
ProudToBeAnAmerican @
Tuesday, December 25, 2007 12:55 PM
|
|
I never said Iraq was related to Sept. 11. There you go again, putting words in my mouth. SCROLL UP; SADAAM HUSSEIN REPEATEDLY VIOLATED UN SANCTIONS AND TREATIES THAT HE AGREED TO AFTER THE FIRST GULF WAR. He threw UN weapons inspectors out of Iraq, He refused to grant the UN to weapons stockpiles. Iraq fire anti aircraft artillery at US aircraft in the no fly zone; and Bill Clinton did NOTHING about it at all. George Bush did what he thought was necessary with the intelligence he had at that time. Go back and review the congressional record, democrats were in agreement at that time. You people are ridiculous the way that you flounder and waffle on issues. How about this ? Why don't you stop whining and complaining, support the cause of freedom and be part of the solution and stop being the biggest problem this country has. You lost in 2000, 2004 and you are going to lose again in 2008 because of the way you have conducted yourselves over the course of this war (treasonous). Get over it, Learn the lesson. Stop undermining this nation and its national security measures. If you did that. You might actually win a presidential election.
|
|
|
By
keeemosabe @
Tuesday, December 25, 2007 1:31 PM
|
|
PTBAA> There you go again. You don't even know what this country is about. (It's not about preventive wars and empire-building) It is about the ability to have a different opinion. And when somebody speaks of better ways to conduct wars or foriegn policy, you and your cohorts call it treasonous. That's the best you can offer? So shallow.
|
|
|
By
keeemosabe @
Tuesday, December 25, 2007 1:52 PM
|
|
Pssst> It's not even about being the whole world's policeman. (They don't particulary want us to be the world policman, but our enemies do want us to chase around the world spending all our integrity, wealth and miltary. After we are spent, like the Soviets, we'd be much weaker) (Don't you know that?)
|
|
|
By
keeemosabe @
Wednesday, December 26, 2007 1:17 AM
|
PTBAA> First, I already said I agreed with Afghanistan so your argument with me is about Iraq and you justify it as a response to terrorist attcks...so if you can follow this, which I doubt, then you are saying we attacked Iraq in response to (its) terrorist attacks. Iknow, I know you are unable to understand that, as you have s Must be a redneck. 2. That comment about hoping people burn in hell shows me the depth of your faith....very childlike, and so very Christian? Please see a clergyman or a psychologist. You need it. I refuse to communicate with someone in such dire need of help on so many levels. I am not qualified to help you. Sorry.
|
|
|
By
ProudToBeAnAmerican @
Wednesday, December 26, 2007 9:32 AM
|
I NEVER Said that Iraq was related to terrorism. Read third post from the top of the page!!! For the THIRD TIME; Saddam Hussein was in clear violation of UN sanctions and treaty agreements from the first gulf war and Bill Clinton did absolutely NOTHING about it. Unfortunately for you, that leads you to a point of frustration because it exposes the liberal poster child Clinton for exactly what he is...a poor excuse for a man!
No, I am not a redneck, far from it. Born raised and educated in Philadelphia, dlkhead. Don't even think of speaking to me about God either. I do have a very meaningful God in my life. I go in burning buildings for a living, I have seen death up close and personal and I have a great deal of courage, the kind of courage that can only be attained through a relationship with a higher power.
You on the other hand, praise a scum bag like Bill Clinton . Correct me if I am wrong. But didn't Bill Clinton veto a ban on partial birth abortions ?? TWICE !! You know what a partial birth abortion is don't you? Thats when they partially deliver a living fetus, late term, exposing the back of the baby's head. Then they proceed to insert a large steel vacuum tube into the living babies brain stem and suck out its brain, killing the innocent baby. Your boy Clinton vetoed a ban on that barbaric practice TWICE !! And you are going to talk to me about God ?? I don't want your help, I don't need your help. As far as I am concerned, I wish all you liberal freaks would eat shit and die.
|
|
|
By
ProudToBeAnAmerican @
Sunday, December 23, 2007 12:08 PM
|
I think the crickets chirping would be the COWARDLY, BABY KILLING Democrats and their Shrill "America has lost this war" battle cry. Democrats have LOST AGAIN !!! Just in time for 08. They have controlled congress for a year; What have they done? Raised the minimum wage, Big deal.
|
|
|
By
ProudToBeAnAmerican @
Monday, December 24, 2007 5:20 PM
|
Extra bonus Iraq war ? No I don't like this war at all. My son is active duty United States Marine Corps. He is in harms way. SO DON"T PUT WORDS IN MY MOUTH. Although I do LOVE The United States of America. The United States is a great nation and the coward democrats along with their socialist media machine have done nothing but undermine American national security and have invested in Americas defeat in the war on terror. They are an embarrassment to this great nation. I guess that is probably why, this congress's approval rating is the lowest in American history.
|
|
|
By
ProudToBeAnAmerican @
Monday, December 24, 2007 5:25 PM
|
|
Clinton wouldn't have had the courage to go to war. You need to have a God to have that kind of courage and we all know that Clinton is an evil person. Saddam Hussein violated all the UN sanctions while the pedophile Clinton was in office. Unfortunately he was too distracted molesting barely legal interns. To deal with clear and present dangers. You can include Osama Bin Laden in the same category.
|
|
|
By
keeemosabe @
Monday, December 24, 2007 5:30 PM
|
Good thing Proud tbaa isn't shrill like he calls others. Wink wink. Hannity types can't see a shred of their hypocrisy as they follow their hannity-hero role model. Did you ask Santa for a hannity action figure this year? I saw one. It looked like it was all mouth.
|
|
|
By
ProudToBeAnAmerican @
Tuesday, December 25, 2007 3:09 AM
|
ARE YOU KIDDING ME kIMOSABE ??? For how many years have we endured unprovoked terrorist attacks ? How many US Marines died in Lebanon in 1983? We tried it The Clintonian, modern day, cowardly democratic party way. Remember the terrorist attack on the world trade center in 1993? Remember the civil criminal trials ? Did they solve the problem ? NO they did not, because we are fighting an evil that needs to be eradicated from the face of the earth.
As far as your republicans love war BU***SH##T.....I will let history speak for itself, you ignorant, ideological idiot.
Woodrow Wilson, President United States of America 1913-1921 DEMOCRAT !! Declared war on Germany in 1917, America NOT directly attacked.
Franklin Delano Roosevelt, President, United States of America, DEMOCRAT 1933-1945. Declared war on Germany, NOT directly attacked by Germany.
Harry S. Truman, President, United States of America, 1945-1953, DEMOCRAT. Utilized nuclear weapons against Japan to end World War II. Deployed American combat troops to Korea to confront communist aggression in 1950 WITHOUT CONGRESS CONSENT ! North Korea never attacked America.
John F. Kennedy, President, United States of America, DEMOCRAT, 1961-1963, Declared that the United States of America would " pay any price, bear any burden, meet any hardship, support any friend, oppose ANY foe, in order to assure the survival and success of liberty". He committed special forces to confront communist aggression in Vietnam.
Lyndon B. Johnson, President of the United States of America, DEMOCRAT, 1963-1969. He radically escalated the war in Vietnam.
You Sir; Do not even know the proud, patriotic history of your party. In my neighborhood you would be referred to, as an IDIOT. I strongly suggest that you GET A CLUE, before you embarrass yourself in a public forum. God Bless America, Semper Fi and Merry Christmas to ALL.
|
|
|
By
ProudToBeAnAmerican @
Tuesday, December 25, 2007 3:22 AM
|
|
No, I asked for a Hillary Blow up Doll...Cause she's all that. What did you ask for ? Higher Taxes? More ridiculous Social Programs, so that we can create more useless crack heads?
|
|
|
By
keeemosabe @
Thursday, December 20, 2007 11:07 AM
|
|
Crickets chirping. Can Drudge.Sludge.Lite compete?
|
|
|
By
keeemosabe @
Sunday, December 23, 2007 1:16 PM
|
|
Dems don't have enough votes yet to control anything,,, when they need 60 votes to overcome the most Senate fillibusters in the history of the US. Maybe that will change soon. Then we will not get into extra bonus wars like Iraq.
|
|
|
By
keeemosabe @
Sunday, December 23, 2007 1:20 PM
|
|
I bet you'd like your Extra Bonus Iraq War a lot less if a Clinton started it........Right????????
|
|
|
By
keeemosabe @
Tuesday, December 25, 2007 10:57 AM
|
PTBAA: I'm not nearly as ideological as you claim. I agree with the concept of the entries into Afghanistan, WWI, and WWII. Even erroneous military moves can be supported, if the damage is contained in some sane way. Vietnam did not have to become the debacle it did. But give Kennedy credit also for managing to avoid nuclear war. That said, why do you insist Iraq invasion is related to terrorists or 9-11? Even Bush said it was not, though that doesn’t stop Cheney from confusing that issue whenever he opens his mouth. Bush said God told him to invade Iraq. I think he was really hearing his neo-con advisors whispering in his ear. See, rallying America around a war to can be a very potent political weapon to manipulate the political course of the country, as is proved here and throughout America continually. The only skill shown by this administration about this Iraq war and occupation is how it has and is being used for political purposes with an eye toward elections. I'm not here to debate the history of 50 to 100 years ago. I want to avoid repeating and increasing the more relevant mistakes in Iraq, and the mistake of diluting force from where the terrorists were once concentrated enough to defeat far more easily. I want to improve our chances of winning, but you defend and justify and support the mistakes being made. And it seems, you do it for party above county, OR, perhaps you need to be led, right or wrong, by a strongman type president, and cannot psychologically handle the uncertainties of a democracy or republic. Ask yourself why.
|
|
|
By
ProudToBeAnAmerican @
Tuesday, December 25, 2007 4:21 PM
|
Having a different opinion is fine. But if you don't realize by now; after 30 years of un-imaginable terror attacks on our citizens, our embassies, service personell, the world trade center twice. We tried it your way...for over 2 decades. What did appeasement and capitulation get us ? Over 3000 dead bodies in Manhattan, that is what your way got us. People like you are dangerous because you have no comprehension of the danger we face.
I and a lot of people that I know are sick and tired of liberals jamming their agenda down our throats. Treasonous YES ABSOLUTELY TREASONOUS. My son is getting shot at in Al Anbar and the New York Times has the gall to advertise all over their front pages anti-terror methods that the United States employs to keep their citizens safe from the radical Muslim nutcases. That sir is absolutely treasonous and I hope that you ALL burn in hell for making this fight that much more difficult to fight.
|
|
|
By
ProudToBeAnAmerican @
Tuesday, December 25, 2007 4:25 PM
|
|
psst....maybe if corrupt, Islamic governments would police their own problem children, instead of encouraging and financing radicalism; we wouldn't need to be the worlds policemen. But unfortunately we do not live in a perfect world. We tried isolationism...remember? Where did that get us?? World war I and world war II. For being such an educated chap you really don't have much common sense.
|
|
|
Click Here to post a comment
|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |