 |
|
|
|
| Friday, December 14, 2007 |
|
In the News on December 14, 2007
By Eric Livingston ::
3 Comments :: Email to a friend
|
|
The Los Angeles Times runs a story by Ricardo Alonso-Zaldivar about the role of government in the American healthcare system. Healthcare promises to be one of the top issues as we head into the 2008 election, and there is currently a stalemate between Republicans and Democrats regarding how far the government should go in helping the uninsured.
Though many Americans may not realize it, government is already the dominant player in healthcare, with federal and state expenditures accounting for 47% of the projected $2.3 trillion the nation will spend this year. Indeed, many private insurers follow the lead of the biggest government program, Medicare, in setting coverage policies.
Even if nothing changes, government will pick up more than half the nation's healthcare tab by 2017. Universal coverage proposals from the leading Democratic presidential candidates would advance that tipping point to 2011, according to a recent analysis by the consulting firm PricewaterhouseCoopers.
The debate is now centered around whether or not the government's role should be expanded to cover most Americans, or if we can find a balance that preserves private insurance for most American workers and their families.
Hamil Harris pens a story in today's Washington Post about church groups and nonprofits preparing holiday packages for the troops.
Distant war zones never seem so far away yet so close as they do at Christmastime.
Many families have children, siblings, parents or spouses who are serving their country. And thanks to those connections, dozens of church groups, schools and nonprofit organizations in the region have mailed Christmas cheer to military personnel in Afghanistan, Iraq and other far-flung places.
In order to find out how you can help the troops this holiday season, and in the months beyond, please visit here.
The Wall Street Journal, in an op-ed appearing in today's edition, say that as "they careen toward the end of their first year in charge, Congressional leaders seem capable of nothing but futile gestures." The Journal goes onto state that the leadership has been ineffective at completing most of their major objectives for the yera, but considering their agenda, this is beneficial to the nation.
|
|
|
|
|
| Comments |
By
keeemosabe @
Friday, December 14, 2007 11:24 AM
|
|
No doubt the Wall Street Urinal is just as fair and balanced as FauxNews. Of course Congress gets nothing done. It is in Repubs interest to block everything they can to label Congress as "do nothing". It could backfire, as the public may see the answer as electing one party in charge of the House, Senate, and president. And that party may not be the war party of GW Bush. But if it is the Bush party, the US can expect a forever war in Iraq. Of course some would cheer that...especially those who stand to profit from war.
|
|
|
By
Jackson38 @
Friday, December 14, 2007 7:37 PM
|
HMMM, let me see if I get the liberal slant on this right. Their view is that the government knows best on my healthcare? The government can't even manage to deliver the friggin mail in a timely fashion, but they are gonna decide if I need a medical procedure? I feel very comforted knowing Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid are there for us. I think I will contact them and seek their cure for this bout of hysterical laughter I'm experiencing
|
|
|
By
keeemosabe @
Saturday, December 15, 2007 2:22 AM
|
Repubtards want to show us how bad gov't is, get control and show us how bad it can get. A self-fulfilling prophesy. Of course gov't health care by your prescription would be bad. You'd be running it...and show us your vision of how bad it could be. In those civilized countries with national healhcare, the citizens would rise up if it were jeopardized. They defend it. They like it. They know what they are talkng about. Y'all just talk.
Repubtards who like their war so much, why did they mess it up so bad for so long? Clinton showed you how to fight a war in Serbia without losing any soldiers in combat. ZE-RO. Bush showed the world how vulnerable the military is to i.e.d.s and terrorism.
|
|
|
Click Here to post a comment
|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
 |