|
Freedomswatch.org
Contact Officials Sign Petition Invite Friends Support the Troops Contact Us
Blogs
Monday, November 26, 2007
In the News on November 26, 2007
By Eric Livingston :: 1 Comments :: Email to a friend
 

This morning the New York Post ran an editorial describing the flood of Iraqi refugees returning home to a safer Iraq after fleeing earlier violence.  The situation on the ground has improved so much that Retired General Scales, former head of the Army War College, writes that we could be nearing a “culminating point”, a moment when the advantage shifts and the outcome becomes irreversible.  From the editorial:

But research isn't really needed. It's pretty obvious what's going on: The surge - ordered by President Bush and executed by Gen. David Petraeus - is working.

US military casualties have dropped drastically, as have terrorist incidents - down 55 percent since the surge reached full strength. And Iraqi civilian casualties fell 60 percent in that same period.

That translates into a newfound sense of security for Iraqis and Americans alike. Even The New York Times had to admit it in a front-page headline last week: "Baghdad Starts to Exhale as Security Improves."

Also in today’s New York Post, Amir Taheri discusses the need to look beyond the black-and-white statistics of violence to other measures of the situation in Iraq.  This provides a balanced look at the positive signs (handover of territory to Iraqi authorities, driving Al Qaeda from Baghdad and other strongholds, increased oil production) with some areas still needing improvement as we move forward.

Iraq today is a hundred times better than what it would have been under Saddam in any imaginable circumstances. Statistics of violence don't begin to measure the efforts of a whole nation to re-emerge from the darkest night in its history. And in that sense, the news from Iraq since April 2003 has always been more good than bad.

In Human Events, Farid Iman and Kamran Beigi offer their suggestions for avoiding a regional war with Iran.  The authors state that when President Bush takes a clear and hard stance against Iran, without strong congressional support, Iranians knows they can placate the situation by reneging in the short term only to resume their dangerous activities a short time later.

Public pressure on the regime to respect and recognize human rights will encourage and embolden the people of Iran to take risks and to challenge the regime.  The international community and the international labor organizations must do all they can to reduce the cost of political activism in Iran for ordinary workers, women and students.  Once the people of Iran feel the firm support of the United States, they may yet be able to take on the regime and remove it from power.

Comments
By bathroomboy @ Monday, November 26, 2007 3:40 PM
Let's look at the "good" points from the Taheri editorial critically:

"More than 70 percent of the cells created by al Qaeda in Iraq have been dismantled, with vast amounts of money and arms seized from terrorists and insurgents. The so-called Islamic State in Iraq, set up by al Qaeda in parts of four provinces, has collapsed. "

How do we know 70% of the cells have been dismantled? Was a census taken before and after the surge? What is the evidence the the "Isamic State in Iraq" has been dismantled? He contradicts himself in the same editorial when he talks about the "bad":

"The authorities appear to be ignoring cultural fascists who are trying to impose their vision of an "Islamic society" through terror. This is especially the case in the predominantly Shiite provinces of the south, where the so-called campaign of "re-Islamicization" is openly funded by Iran. Friends of the new Iraq must impress on its leaders that these cultural fascists could, in time, prove as deadly as al Qaeda terrorists. "

So how do we know which of the isamic facists are al Qaeda and which are not? Does every member of al Qaeda carry a special card or have tatoo or something?

" Iraqis who'd sought temporary refuge in neighboring countries are returning home in large numbers - 1,000 a day returning from Syria alone. "

I wonder how this rate is measured. I heard the Iraqi president say a few weeks ago that 40,000 thousand refuges have returned home, Some estimate that nearly 4.2 million Iraqis left during the occupation. The 1,000 a day rate is not terribly impressive, and it is misleading. Estimating the number of Iraqis who have returned is far more concrete.

"Thanks to mediation by Abdul-Aziz al-Hakim, leader of the Shiite coalition, the three groups that had withdrawn from Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki's coalition government are expected to return to the fold."

Lets crow about it when they actually return to the fold, and stay there for a while.

"The British forces' handover of Basra to Iraqi authorities was completed without a hitch; Iraq's second largest city is rapidly returning to normal."

That's great news. We should apply this wonderful lesson to the rest of the country. When in Iraq, do like the British do.

This war has been an enormous expense to the American taxpayer. I see absolutely no concrete benefit to Americans that has come out of it. I don't think we are any safer for our efforts.

Amir Taheri is a respectable and scholarly journalist, but he is an Iranian. I don't think he necessarily has the best interest of Americans at heart.

Click Here to post a comment
© 2008 Freedoms Watch | Legal Disclaimers | Privacy Policy

Paid For By
   Freedom's Watch