|
Freedomswatch.org
Contact Officials Sign Petition Invite Friends Support the Troops Contact Us
Blogs
Wednesday, January 30, 2008
In the News on January 30, 2008
By Eric Livingston :: 2 Comments :: Email to a friend
 

An editorial in the Washington Times highlights the fractures within the Democratic party regarding the reauthorization of FISA legislation.  As the debate has grown more heated over the last few weeks, Congressional leadership has increasingly been influenced by liberal interest groups - at the expense of this vital legislation.

But it remains to be seen whether this issue will be resolved anytime soon. While the Republican minority in both chambers is pretty much united in support of the president on FISA, the Democrats are bitterly divided on the issue. In the Senate, the Intelligence Committee chairman, Sen. Jay Rockefeller, West Virginia Democrat, had been working responsibly for months with Sen. Kit Bond, Missouri Republican and ranking member on the Senate panel, to craft the compromise bill granting retroactive liability protection to telecommunications firms that reached the Senate floor last week. But many members of the Senate Democratic Caucus, including Sen. Chris Dodd, Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy and Sen. Russ Feingold, oppose any relief for telecommunications companies and are determined to filibuster any bill that includes it. Under mounting pressure from the left, the Senate Democratic leadership on Monday managed to whip all but a handful of Democrats into line in order to block passage of the Senate Intelligence Committee bill. On Monday, Mr. Rockefeller — sabotaged by his own party's leadership — voted against his own bill and with Mr. Dodd's obstructionist faction.

On the House side, the situation is even more bleak. Last year, the House passed its own FISA bill without retroactive liability, and yesterday afternoon, House Judiciary Committee Chairman John Conyers, Michigan Democrat, vowed to oppose any compromise. Today, Mr. Conyers is expected to be in Williamsburg with his Democratic colleagues. Also present at today's retreat will be 41 members of the relatively moderate "Blue Dog" Democratic group who defied Mrs. Pelosi and Mr. Conyers and joined with House Republicans in August to pass a six-month extension of FISA. Sometime in the next two weeks, the Blue Dogs will likely be called upon once again to stand up to their party's leadership and support retroactive liability protection for American corporations that did their patriotic duty after September 11.

Reuters is reporting that an increasingly defiant Iran is expected to have a nuclear power plant on line within the next year, continuing an Uranium enrichment program that could produce fuel for a nuclear weapons program.

The West suspects Iran's nuclear activities are ultimately aimed at building weapons. Iran, the world's fourth-largest crude oil producer, says it only wants to generate electricity so that it can export more of its oil and gas.

World powers last week agreed the outline of a third U.N. sanctions resolution against Iran, calling for mandatory travel bans and asset freezes for specific Iranian officials and vigilance on banks in the country.

Ahmadinejad said Iran would not halt its disputed uranium enrichment work, technology which can have both civilian and military purposes.

"If you (the West) imagine that the Iranian nation will back down you are making a mistake," he said in a televised speech.

President Bush’s proposal to extend Pell Grants to K-12 grade students is receiving glowing reviews from the Wall Street Journal.  Pell Grants for college students have grown significantly over the last seven years, offering students and parents greater choice and control over their academic futures.  The President’s plan would offer similar grants to those still in grade school, with most of the money going to inner-city areas with schools that have repeatedly failed to pass federal standards, but some in Congress are attempting to block the plan.

…the new Pell grant proposal was immediately denounced by Democrats. The reason, as ever, is because K-12 education is dominated by a union monopoly that can't abide parental choice. Lucky for students the same unions don't yet run American universities.

All students should have access to quality schools.  The President’s Pell Grants for Kids program would empower students and parents to escape from failing public schools and enable them to take control over their education.

Comments
By keeemosabe @ Wednesday, January 30, 2008 12:01 PM
Re Public schools: My previous post will no doubt be scoffed at for accusing righties of wishing public schools to fail. Look at New Orleans where Katrina is looked at as an opportunity to expand the agenda. No rebuilt schools have re-opened as public schools, rather, have only re-opened as charter schools, to which the vaunted 'No Child Left Behind Law" does NOT apply. If you value public education, do not be fooled by the Orwellian name "No Child Left Behind." It is meant to destroy public schools. There is no limit to the opportunism of the right, as evidenced by the New Orleans public school story after Katrina.

By keeemosabe @ Wednesday, January 30, 2008 11:38 AM
Re: public education: Rabid righties despise the public schools and wish them to fail because of their hate of unions that wish to ensure decent pay for public school teachers. This hate of worker input and self determination has led to "No Child Left Behind" which is all about "teaching to the test" After kids have been in public schools for 10 years under this plan many will be so burnt out and bored of this very narrow, restricted, mandated teaching method that they will drop out, causing more public schools to fail....but that is the plan. Charter schools do NOT have to follow this law. Did you ever wonder why? Now you know why....”No Child Left Behind” is designed to make public schools fail and to promote the righties' agenda against unions efforts to represent teachers. That agenda is far more important to them than public education.

Click Here to post a comment
© 2008 Freedoms Watch | Legal Disclaimers | Privacy Policy

Paid For By
   Freedom's Watch